|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Patient Care
- Medical Knowledge
- Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
- Interpersonal and Communication Skills
- Professionalism
- Systems-Based Practice
- + Surgery
|
|
3
|
- 1. Patient Care: compassionate, appropriate, and effective.
- 2. Medical Knowledge: established and evolving biomedical, clinical
sciences and the application of this knowledge to patient care.
|
|
4
|
- 3. Practice-Based Learning and Improvement: learn from patient care and
literature then improve patient care.
- 4. Interpersonal and Communication Skills: effectively exchange
information and teaching with patients, families, and health care team.
|
|
5
|
- 5. Professionalism: commitment to professional responsibilities,
adherence to ethical principles, and sensitivity to a diverse patient
population.
- 6. Systems-Based Practice: awareness of the larger context and system of
health care and the ability to use the system.
- 7. Surgery: capable of doing surgical procedures expected of
comprehensive ophthalmologist.
|
|
6
|
- 1. Resident assessment is based
on the competencies.
|
|
7
|
- Educational Program
- The residency program must require its residents to obtain competence in
the 7 areas below to the level expected of a new practitioner.
|
|
8
|
- Evaluation of Residents:
- The residency program must demonstrate that it has an effective plan for
assessing resident performance and for utilizing assessment results to
improve resident performance.
|
|
9
|
- “Minimal Threshold Model” for accreditation
- Minimum numbers (cases, patients)
- Minimum threshold does not measure competence!
|
|
10
|
- Competency-based model
- Evidence (not just talk)
- Competency-based model examines whether the program is actually
educating
|
|
11
|
- Long term initiative emphasizing clinical outcomes
- Phase One: 7/01-6/02 (completed)
- Resident Review Committee (RRC) define approach appropriate to
specialty.
- Programs plan to integrate competencies and develop new assessment tools
- RRC’s can make constructive criticisms in the form of citations before
July, 2002
|
|
12
|
- Phase Two: 7/02-6/06 (current)
- Improve evaluation process for each competency
- Provide aggregated resident performance data
- RRC to review teaching and assessing competencies with new better tools.
|
|
13
|
- Phase Three: 7/06-6/11
- Performance data used as basis for improvement and accreditation.
- RRC to review improvements to program are data driven
- Phase Four: 7/11 and beyond
- Identify benchmarks
- Educate community about good GME
|
|
14
|
- Accountability
- Public funding supports system
- System is accountable to the “public”
- Public demands “proof of quality”
- Government regulations
- Marketplace “wants their money’s worth”
- So What?
- If we (MDs) don’t do it,
- someone else (politicians) will!
- Produce better Docs?
|
|
15
|
- We need:
- Valid & reliable measures of competence
- Regular and timely performance feedback
- To use assessment results to achieve progressive improvements
|
|
16
|
- OKAP
- faculty evaluations
- “360-Degree Evaluations”
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- 110 video CDs sent
- 94 completed OCEXs
- Data analyzed by SPSS software
- Interrater reliability coefficient
- α = 0.81
- This is good! ACGME wants α
≥ 0.80
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- A purposeful, continuous collection of resident work that exhibits the
resident’s progress, effort and achievement.
- Includes examples of work and
measures of accomplishments.
- Periodic review allows
self-assessment, reflection on progress and provide a basis for change.
- Program director will
periodically review.
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- Think in terms of competencies
- Develop measurable learning objectives
- Choose a few tools (matrix) for measuring objectives
- CAN NOT “DO NOTHING”
|
|
31
|
- Pick tools to cover each competency
- Consider existing tools (global eval, 360)
- New validated tools (OCEX)
- Portfolio
|
|
32
|
- Overcoming inertia
- Unfunded mandate
- Getting faculty “Buy in”
|
|
33
|
- Physicians dislike being told what to do
- Ingenious faculty dodge formal processes
- Additional time commitment
|
|
34
|
- The PD has to be the internal champion
- Start simple & small
- Show success with ONE tool at a time
- “Peer to Peer” = superior tactic
- Form intradepartmental Task Force
- Select individuals with interest in education
- Spread out burden (res & faculty)
|
|
35
|
- Resident assessment is based on
the competencies.
- Maintenance of certification
(MOC) is based on the competencies.
|
|
36
|
- MOC focuses on 6 general competencies integral to quality care:
- Patient care
- Medical knowledge
- Practice-based learning
- Interpersonal & communication skills
- Professionalism
- Systems-based practice
|
|
37
|
- Evidence of professional standing (professionalism)
|
|
38
|
- 2. Evidence of practice performance.
(patient care, practice based learning, systems based practice)
- Office record review
- 3 of 32 topic areas
- 5 charts per topic area
- Review sheets submitted (15)
- Years 3-4
|
|
39
|
- Evidence of professional standing (professionalism)
|
|
40
|
- 2. Evidence of practice performance.
(patient care, practice based learning, systems based practice)
- Office record review
- 3 of 32 topic areas
- 5 charts per topic area
- Review sheets submitted (15)
- Years 3-4
|
|
41
|
- Myopia
- Amblyopia
- Esotropia
- Dry eyes
- Open angle glaucoma
- Cataract
- Diabetic retinopathy
- Ptosis
- Refractive surgery
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- 3. Evidence of commitment to life-long learning &
self-assessment. (medical
knowledge, PBL)
- Part A: Continuing Medical Education (CME) 30 credit hours/year (3
ethics)
- Part B: Periodic Ophthalmic Review Test
(PORT) 2 - 50 item review tests
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- 4. Evidence of cognitive expertise. (medical knowledge)
- Documentation of Ophthalmic Knowledge (DOCK) test
- closed book
- 50 item tests
- 1- core
- 2- practice specific
- years 8-10
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- Maintenance of certification (MOC) process will follow competency model
& use same tools (already happening!)
- Pay for performance models will follow same structure and process
- Outcomes measures will be standardized across specialty and will be used
in hiring/firing and reimbursement decisions
|
|
49
|
- Resident assessment is based on the competencies.
- Maintenance of certification
(MOC) is based on the competencies.
- Lifetime certificate holders may
need MOC.
|
|
50
|
- The concept of competence is something we can all agree upon.
- How to assess/measure it is hard.
- How to relate it to outcomes is harder.
|
|
51
|
- Medical education in the USA is undergoing a paradigm shift!
- Can we educate
- Do we educate? (PROVE IT!)
|
|
52
|
- Will this lead to better Ophthalmologists?
- Don’t know
- Think so!
|
|
53
|
|