Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
What Every Ophthalmologist Should Know About the  ACGME Core Competencies
2
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s Six (7) Core Competencies
  • Patient Care
  • Medical Knowledge
  • Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
  • Interpersonal and Communication Skills
  • Professionalism
  • Systems-Based Practice
  • + Surgery
3
"1"
  • 1. Patient Care: compassionate, appropriate, and effective.


  • 2. Medical Knowledge: established and evolving biomedical, clinical sciences and the application of this knowledge to patient care.
4
"3"
  • 3. Practice-Based Learning and Improvement: learn from patient care and literature then improve patient care.


  • 4. Interpersonal and Communication Skills: effectively exchange information and teaching with patients, families, and  health care team.
5
"5"
  • 5. Professionalism: commitment to professional responsibilities, adherence to ethical principles, and sensitivity to a diverse patient population.


  • 6. Systems-Based Practice: awareness of the larger context and system of health care and the ability to use the system.


  • 7. Surgery: capable of doing surgical procedures expected of comprehensive ophthalmologist.
6
Why should you care?
  •  1. Resident assessment is based on the competencies.


7
“Minimum Program  
 Requirements”
  • Educational Program
  • The residency program must require its residents to obtain competence in the 7 areas below to the level expected of a new practitioner.
8
“Minimum Program
      Requirements”
  • Evaluation of Residents:
  • The residency program must demonstrate that it has an effective plan for assessing resident performance and for utilizing assessment results to improve resident performance.
9
Out with the Old
  • “Minimal Threshold Model” for accreditation
  • Minimum numbers (cases, patients)


  • Minimum threshold does not measure competence!
10
In with the New
  • Competency-based model


    • Evidence (not just talk)


    • Competency-based model examines whether the program is actually educating
11
ACGME Outcome Project
  • Long term initiative emphasizing clinical outcomes


  • Phase One: 7/01-6/02 (completed)


  • Resident Review Committee (RRC) define approach appropriate to specialty.


  • Programs plan to integrate competencies and develop new assessment tools


  • RRC’s can make constructive criticisms in the form of citations before July, 2002
12
ACGME Outcome Project
  • Phase Two: 7/02-6/06 (current)


  • Improve evaluation process for each competency
  • Provide aggregated resident performance data
  • RRC to review teaching and assessing competencies with new better tools.


13
ACGME Outcome Project
  • Phase Three: 7/06-6/11
  • Performance data used as basis for improvement and accreditation.
  • RRC to review improvements to program are data driven


  • Phase Four: 7/11 and beyond
  • Identify benchmarks
  • Educate community about good GME
14
Why Change?
  • Accountability
    • Public funding supports system
    • System is accountable to the “public”
    • Public demands “proof of quality”
    • Government regulations
    • Marketplace “wants their money’s worth”
  • So What?
  • If we (MDs) don’t do it,
  • someone else (politicians) will!


  • Produce better Docs?
15
“Minimum Program
   Requirements”
  • We need:
  • Valid & reliable measures of competence


  • Regular and timely performance feedback


  • To use assessment results to achieve progressive improvements
16
Resident Assessment Tools
  •  OKAP
  •  faculty evaluations
  • “360-Degree Evaluations”
17
Assessment Tool
18
OCEX
19
OCEX Scoring Rubric
20
Interpersonal Skills
21
OCEX: Interrater Reliability
  • 110 video CDs sent
  •  94 completed OCEXs
  • Data analyzed by SPSS software
  • Interrater reliability coefficient
  • α = 0.81
  • This is good!  ACGME wants α ≥ 0.80


22
Assessment Tool
23
Portfolio
  • A purposeful, continuous collection of resident work that exhibits the resident’s progress, effort and achievement.
  •  Includes examples of work and measures of accomplishments.
  •  Periodic review allows self-assessment, reflection on progress and provide a basis for change.
  •  Program director will periodically review.


24
Assessment Tool
25
Surgical Skills Checklist
26
Assessment Tool
27
On-Call Assessment Tool (OCAT)
28
Assessment Tool
29
Assessment Tool
30
WHAT SHOULD
PROGRAMS DO?
  • Think in terms of competencies
  • Develop measurable learning objectives
  • Choose a few tools (matrix) for measuring objectives


  • CAN NOT “DO NOTHING”
31
A Plan
  • Pick tools to cover each competency
    • Consider existing tools (global eval, 360)
    • New validated tools (OCEX)
    • Portfolio


32
The main barrier(s) to success:
  • Overcoming inertia


  • Unfunded mandate


  • Getting faculty “Buy in”
33
Barriers to Buy-in
  • Physicians dislike being told what to do
  • Ingenious faculty dodge formal processes
  • Additional time commitment
34
Achieving Faculty Buy-in
  • The PD has to be the internal champion
  • Start simple & small
  • Show success with ONE tool at a time
  • “Peer to Peer” = superior tactic
  • Form intradepartmental Task Force
  • Select individuals with interest in education


  • Spread out burden (res & faculty)


35
Why you should care:
  •  Resident assessment is based on the competencies.


  •  Maintenance of certification (MOC) is based on the competencies.


36
Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
  • MOC focuses on 6 general competencies integral to quality care:
    • Patient care
    • Medical knowledge
    • Practice-based learning
    • Interpersonal & communication skills
    • Professionalism
    • Systems-based practice

37
Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
  • Evidence of professional standing (professionalism)
    • Maintenance of license
38
Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
  • 2. Evidence of practice performance.     (patient care, practice based learning, systems based practice)
  • Office record review
    • 3 of 32 topic areas
    • 5 charts per topic area
    • Review sheets submitted (15)
    • Years 3-4

39
Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
  • Evidence of professional standing (professionalism)
    • Maintenance of license
40
Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
  • 2. Evidence of practice performance.     (patient care, practice based learning, systems based practice)
  • Office record review
    • 3 of 32 topic areas
    • 5 charts per topic area
    • Review sheets submitted (15)
    • Years 3-4

41
Office
Record Review:
Categories
 (32 total)
  • Myopia
  •  Amblyopia
  •  Esotropia
  •  Dry eyes
  •  Open angle     glaucoma
  •  Cataract
  •  Diabetic retinopathy
  •  Ptosis
  •  Refractive surgery
42
Office Record Review
43
Office Record Review
44
Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
  • 3. Evidence of commitment to life-long          learning & self-assessment.    (medical knowledge, PBL)
  • Part A: Continuing Medical Education (CME) 30 credit hours/year (3 ethics)
  • Part B: Periodic Ophthalmic Review Test   (PORT) 2 - 50 item review tests


45
Periodic Ophthalmic Review Test (PORT) categories:
46
Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
  • 4. Evidence of cognitive expertise. (medical knowledge)
    • Documentation of Ophthalmic Knowledge (DOCK) test
      • closed book
      • 50 item tests
      • 1- core
      • 2- practice specific
      • years 8-10

47
Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
  • Timeline


48
Long term implications
  • Maintenance of certification (MOC) process will follow competency model & use same tools (already happening!)


  • Pay for performance models will follow same structure and process


  • Outcomes measures will be standardized across specialty and will be used in hiring/firing and reimbursement decisions
49
Why you should care:
  • Resident assessment is based on the competencies.


  •  Maintenance of certification (MOC) is based on the competencies.


  •  Lifetime certificate holders may need MOC.


50
The Bottom Line
  • The concept of competence is something we can all agree upon.


  • How to assess/measure it is hard.


  • How to relate it to outcomes is harder.


51
The Bottom Line
  • Medical education in the USA is undergoing a paradigm shift!


  • Can we educate


  • Do we educate? (PROVE IT!)
52
The Real Issue
  • Will this lead to better Ophthalmologists?


  • Don’t know


  • Think so!
53
Thank you for your attention