|
1
|
- Andrew G. Lee, M.D.
- Professor of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery
- The H. Stanley Thompson Neuro-ophthalmology Clinic
- The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
|
|
2
|
- The 10 commandments of performance appraisal provide a foundation for
the surgical training process
- R.G. Williams, PhD
- Department of Surgery Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
|
|
3
|
- Time: valuable & limited
- Test knowledge application not facts
- Beware situation & case specificity
- Define blueprint & align with testing
- Multiple tools, multiple times, multiple observers
- 6. Teach & Assess at same time
- 7. Test score meaning > #
- 8. Give credit when due
- 9. Give feedback (formative & summative)
- 10. Share information with learner
|
|
4
|
- Don't test unless prepared to act on results
- Sample systematically & broadly
- Use most time-efficient assessment (but reliable & valid) method
- Assess only important competencies
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- Test ability to use knowledge
- Test “knowledge only” as proxy to determine if fund of knowledge is
limiting step
|
|
7
|
- Test for tasks & situations systematically
- Good performance in one situation ≠ good in all situations (halo
effect)
- Even if competencies seem closely related
- Pilots licensed to fly 727s or 747s, not given unlimited pilots'
licenses
|
|
8
|
- Use clearly articulated blueprint & behavioral objectives as
guideline for test development
- Make sure tests accurately mirror blueprint
- Align testing activities with objectives requires commitment &
discipline
|
|
9
|
- No 1 assessment measures all objectives (multiple assessments)
- No 1 score predicts performance (multiple tools)
- Pick right assessment tool for job (validity)
- Avoid tendency to test qualities that are easily measured
- Different appraisers focus on different aspects of performance (multiple
observers = 360 degree)
|
|
10
|
- Give maximum feedback for each assessment
- Teach & Assess simultaneously
- Use rich multi-dimensional profile of performance, as opposed to a
single grade (summative)
- Use assessment events to achieve instructional ends
- Use an imprecise (over no) measure of a competence if the competence
being measured is highly important
|
|
11
|
- Look beyond what they do & learn why they do it
- Behavior interpreted/understood (give meaning)
- Compare scores of other examinees (cohort, peer benchmarked, norm
referenced)
- Pre-define levels of performance (criterion based, behavior anchors,
scoring rubric)
- Improving score on same task over time
- Persons with similar scores have fared in practice (“as good as Resident
x”)
|
|
12
|
- Overly structured assessment plans can result in failure to recognize
creativity & unusual achievements of learners (i.e., be flexible)
- Give credit for what has been learned
- Recognize achievement of learning outcomes
|
|
13
|
- Give feedback that is situation specific, descriptive, &
constructive (formative vs. summative feedback)
- What did the learner do?
- In what context?
- Why was their performance desirable or undesirable?
- How could the situation be handled more effectively (improved)?
- Document improvement over time
|
|
14
|
- Sharing => appraisals: fair, descriptive, & constructive
- Promotes self reflection & continuous learning
- Makes learner main beneficiary of your appraisal
- Portfolio documentation
|
|
15
|
- Time: valuable & limited
- Test knowledge application not facts
- Beware situation & case specificity (halo effect)
- Define blueprint & align with testing
- Multiple tools, multiple times, multiple observers
- 6. Teach & Assess at same time
- 7. Test score meaning > #
- 8. Give credit when due
- 9. Give feedback (formative & summative)
- 10. Share information with learner
|
|
16
|
|